Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of sound dietary advice versus the Sid Bonkers portion control method.
After evaluating the threads and postings from the Bonkers ones the postings were considered for relevance for the average diabetic, for those looking to lose weight, the safe reduction of BG numbers, and to evaluate if any sound information whatsoever could be found.
Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence related to the aforementioned Bonkers portion control method. Can a man or woman live on 17 grams of cornflakes and a splash of milk, supplemented with hobnob biscuits and the occasional tin of Celebration chocolates. What risks are associated with a long term 1200 calorie diet.
A full evaluation was made of the Bonkers diet, and the value of the information was considered, together with an assessment of the participants behaviour.
Conclusions: After thorough and exhaustive examination of the said posts and the Bonkers portion control diet, they were considered to be as much use to the average diabetic as a rubber beak on a woodpecker ! Study participants suffered from extreme Lowcarbus Antius Maximus Cretinopathy a chronic condition.. It is highly likely this kind of diet leads to rudeness, trouble making and cognitive failure. Patients displayed increasing paranoia and at times a state of pronounced delusion. One participant believed he was Caligula in a previous life, another thought he was Joseph Stalin.
Remedy: A diet of 2000-2500 calories a day based on non starchy vegetables, high quality fats and adequate proteins. Very active diabetics may require a higher calorie intake.
Professor Leopold J Knobheadski Emeritus Professor Broadmore Institute for Diabetes Forum Lunacy.
Professor Leopold J Knobheadski has no conflicting interests. Welcome to the crazy world of diabetes.
No comments:
Post a Comment